Is it a hypocrisy to see a debate about whether to feed stray cats and dogs? This in itself is a very controversial topic, and the video produced a more intense debate with the beautiful moderator. It was very rational to think that such stray cats and dogs should not be fed, but should be sent to the city management centre either to be adopted home or to take a more brutal approach to their death.
And this beautiful host is very emotional, gentle and full of love. She considered the feeding of stray cats and dogs as a gesture of goodwill, a form of human care for weak animals, not hypocrisy, but rather love and kindness. After all, everyone has a hidden heart, and when we see a weaker animal, we inevitably have compassion that will help it. At the beginning of the debate, we saw such a moving picture. A group of people, with their own pet dogs, chatting and laughing, while the other one was abandoned by the stray dogs, shrunk and dirty and looked at them. “Standing around, with a strong sense of contrast.”
And whoever sees this side of the scene, it hurts the stray dog and it creates a desire to feed it. So is it right to feed this stray dog? Whether or not your moment of goodwill is worth promoting is the most critical point in this debate. The rationality of the shelving is certain, the killing is too cruel. It is in the debate, though negative, that he rationally analyses the range of social issues that arise from herding. A lot of stray dogs gather in the city, and for many children, adults may fear that the dogs will bite them. At the same time, it is suggested that you can feed animals at a reasonable place, and if you really don't want to go to zooheads, we can switch to animal feeding, like fish feeding pigeons. After all, a plethora of stray dogs can cause a lot of trouble to others. Add to this the fact that stray dogs are dirty, have a lot of bacteria, and that dogs like to bark, can cause noise pollution in cities, and so on. The solution to these huge stray dogs is to kill them. We support his rational analysis, but it is true that killing ignores the very nature of humanity. We can find other, more dual ways of dealing with vagrancy, rather than knowing their lives with a hammer. After all, since we have the ability to hunt, why can't we concentrate? Don't easily define the ideas and arguments of our good lady host, which are very sensitive, as if they share the right to live for those little animals. It is not hypocrisy that a girl's good heart is certain and encourages it. It's probably time for a lot of questions. If you really want to worry about stray cats and dogs, why don't you adopt them? In fact, when we do good, we decide whether or not to do it because of our abilities. After all, the richest and most loving are willing to feed these stray cats and dogs. It's probably either a group of older people or a group of young people who are just getting into society.