Henan Anyang's "dog bite" has been decided and the dog owner has been suspended

The situation in Henan Anyang “dog bites” was resolved, and the owner of the dog was suspended from duty in one of his units and cooperated with the organizational verification. At the moment, Wang has made an apology, being sincere, with one of the kings, and the leader of one of his units.

Two big dogs tore up on an 80-year-old man, and the dog owner, as a public official, was so brazen and angry. Had it not been for this cry, the matter would still not have come to an end, and at the present time Wang has been suspended from his office, which is, to be honest, not a punishment, but a temporary suspension of his functions, an investigation or a review.

Henan Anyang's

It is a matter of concern that, at the time of Wang's apology, the head of his unit had come together, and it was clear that the impact of the incident had spread to his unit, and that the final outcome of the investigation would depend on the penalties that would follow, given that Wang's suspension.

In fact, even if the owner of the dog did not apologize, as the biter, it would be perfectly civil.

Under article 1246 of the Civil Code, animal breeders or managers are liable for violations of regulatory provisions that do not take safety measures against animals that cause harm to others; however, liability may be mitigated by proving that the damage was done intentionally by the victim.

That is to say, even if the owner of the dog does not pay compensation and does not apologize, the old man may be dealt with in a civil suit and, because of his old age, may be assisted by the assigned lawyer with the help of the local legal aid centre.

Of course, the incident, on the one hand, was caused by some of the king's irregularities, and, on the other hand, by Wang's arrogant attitude, triggered the most vulnerable side of the population.

Finally, all those who love pets must have dogs and civilized dogs in accordance with the law and not cause trouble to others so that your pets cannot be with you! What do you think about this case?