Jiazhou Evening News Reporter / Yao Yao Mei
Not only does the dog walk without a rope, but the dog doesn't take care of himself, he not only admits it, he doesn't take responsibility, but he also goes on to say something. Henan An-yang, the owner of a dog in a district in Hubei Wuhan, is he not the only one in Jiazhou. Why can't a dog walk without a rope? Why do dogs always hurt people? Why are policies and regulations so indifferent? The Ui Cai Evening newspaper, the Government Service's 12345 People's Hotline, the “Premptly” online platform, has focused on popular hot spots and has contributed to solving the problem of popular distress.
[Citizen Shouting]
These complaints are related to uncivilized dogs.
1. Mr. Tang: The 67 5th floors of the industrial park in the district have been illegally raised without a dog certificate.
2. Ms. Tsun: The doghouse pet shop opposite the Vienna Hotel in the centre of the city, with no qualifications for rabies vaccination and dog certification.
3. Mr. Hu: In the morning, there are often large dogs who don ' t tie dog ropes and bark at pedestrians, and there are security risks.
Mr. Lin: There is a suspicion that there are “dogs” in the small area of the town of Roses in the Quain Road in the Hao Tong District, free of dog ropes, requesting the authorities concerned to arrest them.
5. Mr. Ho: Every night between 8 and 9 p.m. in the plaza north of the city centre, many people walk without a dog and suggest better management.
6. Ms. Wu: In the Zenitian Zone, in the small family-friendly neighbourhood, many owners have dogs that do not hold dog ropes, affecting other owners ' normal lives.
7. Mr. Ma: On 8 November, the child was chased and bitten by a dog raised by a staff member at Gate 5 North Uttar Pradesh. How should I be consulted?
8. Ms. Zhao: In the vicinity of the Whitestone Harbor Rainbow Bridge in the Rock Peaks, many walk without a dog.
9. Mr. Lee: There are many owners of pet dogs in the Golden Lot area of the Zone tomorrow, who walk without a leash.
"Reporter research."
There's a dog bite tomorrow in the district.
The man was forced to sue the dogkeeper.
Last month, Mr. Lee, a small district resident of the Zion, called the government services hotline for 12345 tomorrow, according to which many owners of the Zone walk their dogs. Further information was received from the journalist, and the main reason for his complaint was that he had been bitten by a dog. The dogs in the gold-collar district will be out there tomorrow. (Reporter/Yo Tsumi)
Complaints: No dog bites on camera, son of a bitch.
Mr. Lee, who lives in Kim Chae tomorrow, 7 November at around 8 a.m., went out to the first floor, “Just as I was picking up the car, a puppy was round here and suddenly bit me in the belly of my left leg, and then yelled at me”.
After being bitten by a dog, Mr. Lee first shouted, "Who's dog is bit?" The owner of the dog was not found at once, and he made a presentation to the small property company. As a result of the deep wounds and bleeding, Mr. Lee immediately went to the street community health service centre for rabies.
On 7 November, property staff identified the dog ' s owner, and contacted Mr. Kikuchi and Mr. Lee to arrange consultations that night. At the time, a verbal promise was made to “compensate the dog for injury”.
"Someone who finds no dog bites, the tone changes." Mr. Lee said that one of them would only pay $1,000.
According to Mr. Lee, after the incident, some of the bite dogs were kept. On the same day, when he and his wife came to the door, the dog bit his wife on the heel and fortunately she was wearing leather shoes, which he did not bite, or else he would be bitten.
The first consultation was unsuccessful, and on 8 November Mr. Li called the Government Service Helpline 12345 and the 911 call.
Mr. Lee stated that after three mediations by the police officers at the chestnut police station, the first two of which promised compensation of $1,200, Mr. Lee considered that all medical expenses should be compensated, totalling $2229, and that invoices were provided to the police station. But I don't agree.
By the time of the third civilian police contact, “she directly stated that she would not pay any money, that she would prosecute and that she would be detained”.
In view of the lack of prospects for a negotiated claim, Mr. Lee has recently filed a lawsuit with the Court, “I am simply asking for the sum of money to be paid, not a single point, and I did not expect it to be so difficult”.
Mr. Lee ' s leg was scarred by a dog bite. (Reporter/Yo Tsumi)
Verification: The property crew is trying to persuade the dog breeder.
“That day I was on duty, Mr. Lee's son found me and said his father was bit by a dog. I told him to film the dog's cell phone." The district property staff said that she immediately sent the photos to the household microcade, asking “Whose dog is this?” I'll soon find out about the dog's owner.
“I called her, she promised to negotiate, but she wanted to set up surveillance, so no dog bites, and she was willing to pay more than 1,000. Staff say.
According to the staff member, prior to the complaint, she was calling Kiyochi to advise him not to keep the dog on the aisle outside her home. Mr. Lee's son had to say that his father had been bit by a dog, but he was not expecting to be a dog.
The staff members stated that they then went to ask the residents who were sitting at the door of the seven first floors at the time of the incident, “no one dared to testify”.
According to staff members, there were many people in the subdistrict who used to walk without a dog, who worked with property workers, and some of the households were constricted and sent to the countryside. But there's something you can't talk about, like Zhui. Joint law enforcement has also been carried out by the relevant authorities, such as public security, urban administration and the community, but has not worked as well.
RESPONSE: Pay compensation. Evidence of dog bites.
On the night of 1 December, Mr. Lee took a journalist to his house on the second floor of the aisle and saw only a black-and-white pet dog barking at Mr. Lee in the aisle and a dog's nest in the aisle. When someone came, a woman put a dog in the chain.
Mr. Lee told the reporter that the dog bit him.
This woman is the owner of the dog. She told reporters that the dog was a stray dog she had picked up four or five months ago in the neighborhood, and that she would pay compensation for the dog's bite on Mr. Lee if he had proof.
"You say my dog bit someone, and then I kill someone?" "I didn't go to surveillance, and I asked the people downstairs, "I don't know, the dog's feariest, it can't bite." He (Mr. Lee) invoiced at the police station, which the police officers had read, and I did not have to read.” “I do not know what the burden of proof is reversed”.
Research: In the streets, in the neighborhoods, dogs are visible everywhere.
Mr. Li is not the only one who has been involved in a dispute over the violation of the right to walk his dog. Mr. Lu, who lived in Sub-Sector No. 1 of New City, was found with a pet dog in his neighbor ' s house, who liked to bark when he met strangers, and Mr. Lu ' s son, who feared being bitten, kept his pants on every occasion. On several occasions, Mr. Lu advised the neighbour to hold the dog and hold it together, but the neighbour remained indifferent. Upon being called to the police, the civilian police educated their neighbours.
Without exception, Mr. Yi, who lives in Pearl River Garden in the Zenitian District, was almost “feed” by a pet dog when he went out for dinner. "The dog jumps on the table and wants to eat what's in my bowl. The dog's owner is next to me. The dog doesn't have a dog rope."
In many places, such as Kim Chae, Yong Dao, Pearl River Garden and Yang Square, journalists have seen the phenomenon of “dog walkers without strings”.
Newtown One's no-dog-lined dog. (Reporter/Izu曈)
Round table issues
How can a dog walk without a rope?
The boss of the party, Zhou Zhou Zhou, who is not bound by the dog, also calls himself “a man's life is worse than his life”; Henan Anyang King's dog, who is responsible for his failure to take responsibility, provokes public outrage; and Hu Bei Wuhan, a woman who has been driven out of the forest to pursue her dog, who has been surrounded, verbally abused, beaten and eventually resisted in the extreme by jumping from the building. With the Civil Code in place, and in some places, there are regulations on dogs, why is it still not round?
This round-table paper invites the public security organs, the Department of Disease Control and Control. Focus dogs only regulate, protect and actively seek solutions.
Deputy Commander Deng Yong of the Integrated Management Unit of the City Public Security Bureau:
For a long time, the lack of dog-to-dog connection has been a major public disease, as domestic dogs are offensive only to people and cause injury.
The introduction of the Civil Code and the Animal Vaccination Act, which clearly define the liability for the violation, and the Regulations on the Management of Dogs in the City of Jiazhou, which provide for more detailed regulations, and the identification of the subjects of law enforcement, are good for regulating the conduct of dogs, safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of victims and regulating the conduct of dogs in violation of the law.
In accordance with the Regulation on the Management of Dogs in the City of Jiazhou City, when a dog is taken out of the house by a dog owner or dog manager, he or she shall hold a dog by a dog rope of less than two metres, and he or she shall hold a dog in close proximity to the dog or carrying a dog on the stairs, elevators and other crowded occasions. Public security organs may warn and order corrective action in cases where dogs are not held hostage, and if they refuse to do so, they may fine and detain dogs with penalties only. If a dog is not tied to a rope and the dog only bites another person, the dogkeeper shall immediately refer the victim to a medical institution, advance the medical expenses and bear responsibility for the violations. At the same time, if the public security authorities find that dogs only harm others or are reported to have done only harm to others, they will, in accordance with the law, detain the dogs and send them to institutions such as animal clinics for observation in order to ascertain whether they have rabies.
As can be seen, the current policy and regulations regulating the handling of dogs in violation of the law have been clearly defined, and law enforcement has been stepped up accordingly. Since 1 May this year, more than 300 cases of dog walkers have been punished.
Yuan Xin Jian, Director of Emergency Response, City Center for Disease Prevention and Control:
While pet dogs tend to show no harm to humans or animals for most of the time, it is not precluded that dogs only occasionally attack strangers because of their sexual indeterminate nature. A dog of unstable character, such as a Chihuahua or a canine, can easily be alerted and attacked by a pet owner who lacks domestication experience. And dog-to-dog ropes can, to some extent, reduce the probability that dogs will attack only people.
In addition, acute infectious diseases caused by the rabies virus, most people are infected by the bites of sick dogs, not only do dog-to-dog ropes reduce the range of attacks by dogs, but can also intervene or stop dog attacks in a timely manner, indirectly reducing the risk of rabies to the human body. This year, the number of cases of rabies in our city as a result of dog bites has been reduced to single digits.
On the news, two untied dogs were playing around. (Reporter/Izu曈)
Relevant legislation:
Regulation of regulations, penalties for violations of the law, in fact, are prescribed.
It is understood that the Civil Code makes clear provisions for the sole raising and management of dogs. Our city has a more detailed regulation on the regulation of urban dogs in the city.
According to articles 1234, 1246, 1247, 1249, 1250 and 1251 of the Civil Code, animal breeders who cause damage to others, those who do not take safety measures against animals who do not cause harm to others, those who prohibit the raising of dangerous animals, such as dogs, who cause harm to others during abandonment, escape, and those who cause harm to others by the fault of a third person, are responsible for violations and can prove that the damage was caused by wilful or gross negligence on the part of the victim, and may not be incurred or mitigated.
The Regulation on the Management of Dogs in the City of Jiazhou specifies that the dogkeeper or dog manager shall hold a dog by a canine rope of less than two metres; it is prohibited to hold dogs in office areas, hospitals, kindergartens, school teaching areas, student dormitories, unit collective dormitories and public areas such as building blocks, greenfields, etc.; if the dogkeeper or dog manager fails to take safety measures to cause injury to others, the victim shall immediately be brought to a medical institution for medical treatment, with the payment of medical expenses; the public security authorities shall find that the dog only hurts another person or is reported to have injured another person, and shall detain the dog and send him to an animal clinic for observation.
In violation of the provisions of the Regulations, the public security organs impose penalties for ordering modifications, fines, detention and confiscation of dogs.
Article 4, paragraph 5, of the Regulations of the Supreme People's Court on Certain Evidence in Civil Proceedings provides that: “Tort action for damage to a person caused by the raising of animals is the burden of proof on the animal breeder or manager in respect of the fault of the victim or the fault of a third person.” As can be seen, the applicable system of reversal of the burden of proof is applied to violations caused by the absence of a dog.
Short assessment: No ignorance, no fear to challenge the law Line
Whether she is the owner of the party, the king of Henan Anyang, the owner of the village of Lu, the victim of Wuhan in Hubei, or the owner of the district of Kim Chai tomorrow, she is not only unaware of her own violations, but also of the harm done to others, and he is arrogant and indifferent to the consequences of the violations, and he is not surprised at the anger caused by the consequences of the violations.
From the central to the local level, there are many reasons to believe that dog walkers are still prohibited and violations are still difficult to resolve. First, the law is not strong enough and the cost of violating the law is low. The penalties are limited to warnings, fines, and the detention or confiscation of dogs, which makes it difficult to act as an effective deterrent to offenders; and, secondly, the insufficiency of the strike and the persistence of the violation. For example, the dogs of Zhui were not detained and checked for rabies after the public security authorities had been called; third, there was insufficient publicity and civilized dogs did not reach the human heart. Dogs are only raised or managers are poorly informed about policy regulations and even have a sense of exclusion. Added to these two reasons, ignorance of the law is used as a pretext for committing an offence, thus flouting the dignity of the law and even raising the suspicion that it is illegal.
[Department Response]
Last-period citizen calls for progress.
1. Mr. Zhang (China): I am a resident of the Great New Village in the Hundong District. What is the government subsidy for the installation of elevators in our building and for consulting older neighbourhoods?
The Municipal Housing and Urban Construction Authority replied that, according to the Measures for the Implementation of the Installation Elevator for Established Housings in the City of Jiazhou, non-uni-owned housing units on four or more floors of State land are equipped with elevators, and the municipal and district finances are subsidized by $50,000 each.
Response: 30 November
Satisfaction: very satisfactory
2. Ms. Woo: I am the owner of the family building at Hunan Industrial University East School, where there are currently no elevators, which are not convenient. What are the procedures to be followed if you apply for an elevator? Is it property or industry?
The Mayor ' s Hotline Office replied: It was recommended to go to the community to submit an application.
Response: 23 November
Satisfaction: basic satisfaction
3. Mr. Rowe: When do you want to know when they will arrive?
The Office of the Political Hotline replied that only the Nanbu Building in the Yongquan Street Community had applied for the installation of elevators, that the installation of elevators in that building had now been completed and submitted for government subsidy information, that the matter had been reported to the Finance Department for application and that the procedure would be processed and transferred to the designated account of the owner of the application for the installation of elevators, after the City Finance Department had allocated it to the Government.
Response: 24 November
Satisfaction: basic satisfaction
4. Mr. Hu: Five of the people ' s banks of the Zone applied for elevators last year and the Zone property guidance centre did not follow normal procedures, which made it impossible to implement the request.
The Government of the Zone replied that the installation of elevators in the small district of the People ' s Bank of the Zone was regulated by law. Residents who do not wish to install elevators may report to the Community House Council or to the Government, which coordinates them. A small proportion of the population is reluctant to install elevators, and most of those who support the installation of elevators can file a civil action with the People ' s Court, remove obstacles and share the costs in proportion to the floor. If the sentence is not self-executing, an application for enforcement may be made to the People ' s Court.
The Tarzan Street Office replied that provision had been made for the installation of elevators in the sector, as the owner of the second floor of the module opposed the installation of elevators, the construction was delayed and community coordination failed on several occasions.
Response: 26 November
Satisfaction: basic satisfaction
5. Mr. Chen: In order to build the elevators thickened the stairs of the roads, 17 elevators were now damaged in Shinmura, Cedar Zone, and it was hoped that the authorities concerned would investigate whether they had affected the weighting structure.
Urban Housing and Urban Construction Authority replied that 17 units 1 and 2 of the city ' s capital were equipped with elevators into sub-salt structures, which had previously been ordered to be overhauled because of irregularities. The results of the Hunan Zenith Test Certification Ltd. found that the original structure of the house had not been clearly damaged and that the concrete strength, banding and plate thickness of the stairs of the house were generally consistent with the original design drawings.