Ms. Tan went on a regular walk in the same neighborhood, where she met a young girl, who was feeding two stray dogs on the side of the road. Two stray dogs found her passing and were frightened. The two stray dogs then started chasing after Ms. Tan, who took the bag in her hand to beat the two stray dogs without trying to slip down on her feet, and finally stayed in the hospital and spent a lot of money. After leaving the hospital, Ms. Chen brought her to court, believing that the young girl was the keeper or manager of two stray dogs without any fault or fault in the process, and that she was also injured, amounting to a tenth degree of injury.
Many people in the district have fed the two stray dogs, and they were feeding them at the time of the incident, but the two stray dogs had nothing to do with themselves, and Ms. Chen felt that she should not be held responsible. The court found that, although the evidence available did not show that Chen was indeed the animal breeder, Ms. Chen had given food to the two stray dogs, which had a time-bound management responsibility at the time of the incident, and that she had certain responsibilities, while the court held Ms. Tan to be responsible for her own injuries as a result of her panic. The court ruled that Ms. Chen was responsible for the loss of the field and for 50 per cent of her liability, i.e. damages of over $50,000. In this case, the question is whether Miss Chen can be considered an animal manager.
The court said she had a time-barred management responsibility, that is, you were the manager when you fed the two stray dogs, and in addition to her possible responsibility, the property in the district, including the community and the related functions, which were long in the neighborhood and were not run by anyone. These stray dogs have led to their prolonged presence in the community, but others have said that they belong to a caring group like Little Chen. It was very sad for the patriots and for the netizens,
It is important that the way and the way to stop a dog who loves a dog is appropriate, that it be left to the competent authorities to find an appropriate solution, because such a dog does not normally have rabies vaccine, does not have anything, does it represent a potential threat to the inhabitants of the community, that it is too late to regret something more serious, or do the netizens think that if they don't want to feed a stray dog, if they bite, it's trouble to know how you see it? Welcome to the comment area. I'm a bee. Every time you say something, forward and comment, it's my greatest support.