In the early hours of 13 November, Ms. Lou, a 35-year-old owner living in the San Emile quarter of Wuhankin Land, jumped off the roof of the 32nd floor. It is alleged that before she jumped from the building, she left a last message in the herd saying that I had been charged with my life. As a result, netizens suspected that Ms. Lou ' s jump should have been linked to an insult, verbal abuse and even beating by a dogless owner.
According to media reports, in September of this year, Ms. Lou was chased by a dog without a leash in the district, and was frightened by her fear of the dog as a child. In response, she questioned the owner of the dog for not holding the rope while picking up branches to scare the pet dog, and her actions led to dissatisfaction on the part of the owner. In the days since then, Ms. Lu has had several clashes with the owner of the dog, who has been insulted, verbally abused and even beaten on several occasions because of her lack of single strength, and despite the fact that Ms. Lu has responded to the street and the property, the problem has not been solved.
Following the death of Ms. Lou, her family began an investigation into the evidence, according to which, according to some of the owners, Ms. Lu ' s suicide should be linked to the long-standing verbal abuse of Ms. Lu by a dogless owner. As a result, Ms. Lu ' s family reported the incident to the public security authorities on the grounds that Ms. Lu had been harassed. According to media reports, on 23 November the case was taken up by the local police and is currently under further investigation.
Ms. Lu ' s family believes that Ms. Lu committed suicide and that, in addition to the necessary responsibility of the owner of the dog who repeatedly insulted, verbally abused and even beat Ms. Lu, the property of the community should also be held responsible. On 25 October, after a period of over 10 hours of mediation between the neighbourhood organization community, the Housing Authority, etc., and the division of responsibilities, a settlement was reached between the property sector and Ms. Lu ' s family.
However, the directors of the property in the sub-district said that, through surveillance, they had already moved out of the sub-district shortly after the incident, when they had verbally abused the owners of the Luna dogs in the community. The family was also allegedly prepared to sell their homes in the district for $7.49 million.
It was also alleged that the abuse of the dog owners of Luna in the Twitter community did not hold themselves responsible in the case of Ms. Lu ' s suicide by jumping off the building, and they refused to compensate Ms. Lu ' s family.
According to information received by the media from the police, the police are currently expanding the scope of the investigation into the evidence, and several relatives and colleagues of the deceased Ms. Lou have been questioned by the police, who will look into the minor existence of emotional disputes, family conflicts, debts, health conditions, etc. of the deceased, pending clarification before deciding how to proceed.
There was a lively discussion when a large number of netizens learned from the Internet that Ms. Lou ' s family had reached an agreement on compensation with the property.
Netizens love money: In any case, this is a welcome outcome. After all, the property had assumed a certain responsibility, which was far greater than its unwillingness to assume any responsibility, and Ms. Lu ' s family should therefore also be grateful to the authorities for the importance they attached to the case.
Netizens cry out: Whether or not the property in the district was responsible in the past, the property in the district is beginning to be responsible in the light of what has happened. It is to be hoped that the property in the district will learn from this and will be resolved as soon as possible in the face of the claims of the owners.
Anyway, there's a lot of talk on the Internet. Do you have anything to say about the fact that Ms. Lou's family has reached an opinion on compensation with the property?