In recent days, a “westie” foster care for a pet dog at the mouth of the sea died in a shop called OK.PET, located on the side of the Shangbai Beach, where Mr. Wang, who believed that it was due to the improper supervision of the pet shop that resulted in the death of the pet dog, claimed $50,000 from the shopkeeper. In response, the pet shop considered Mr. Wang to have been placed in foster care with a sick dog, concealing the fact that the dog had just been discharged, and considered himself “set up”.
Earlier, Mr. Wang of Haiguchi complained to the International Tourist Island that his pet had died “unexpectedly” while in foster care and that he had embarked on a rights-based approach for his pet dog. On 29 September, Mr. Wang, who lives in a small area of the Heng Dynamite, a small shop called Ok.PET downstairs, placed “West West” in foster care at the pet shop, where he entered into a six-month foster care agreement at a cost of $30 per day. In the early hours of 8 October, “West” died.
“The caller found that `Westie' did not live in a single marble den, but in an iron cage.” Mr. Wang told reporters that the pets had been purchased at a cost of 23,000 yuan, that his wife had a very good relationship with the pet, that the wife had just given birth and had a very low mood, which had an impact on breastfeeding. “Irresponsible supervision of the pet shop has caused the death of the dog, thereby hurting my family, and I am bound to defend my rights.”
Mr. Wang claimed $50,000 from the pet shop, saying that the $50,000 included the cost of buying a dog, the cost of a wife ' s mental loss, etc. “In accordance with article 5, subparagraph 3, of the Foster Care Agreement, it is stated that responsibility for loss or accidental death of a pet during foster care rests with B.”
Commercial journalists visited the pet shop, which fosters many lovely pet dogs. In response to Mr. Wang's claim of 50,000 for the death of his pet dog, a director of the pet shop who did not want to reveal his name was deemed to have been “set up” by the owner of the dog to allow Mr. Wang to go through legal proceedings. "First of all, he's the irresponsible dog owner, `Westie' is pathetic. Why is the dog not well, not in the pet hospital, but in foster care at the pet store? According to the rules, no pet store will receive a dog who has just been discharged.”
According to Mr. Wang's medical records from the Grand Patient Centre of the Sea, “Westie” was visited on 28 September and was taken to the pet shop the following day, on 29 September. The pet's medical record shows that the pet's physical function is not abnormal, but that it has mild heat damage, and medical advice shows that “the fluid is fully restored after treatment, avoiding too much excitement, etc.”. For this reason, Mr. Wang believes that his pets are not seriously ill and that the neglect of the pet shop led to the death of the pets.
For its part, pet shops indicated that they did not receive sick dogs who had recently been discharged, even if it took at least three weeks to observe them. “Mr. Wang did not comply with the provisions of the foster care agreement and informed the pet of his physical condition. Besides, they didn't buy the dogs. They picked them up from the Internet cafe." The official provided the journalist with video surveillance of the pet shop and said, “You see, Mr. Wang's wife told us that he had been picked up at the Internet cafe when the dog was dirty and pathetic”. Once again, when the journalist asked Mr. Wang to testify, he changed his words to “adoption with a friend of the Internet cafe”.
With regard to the dispute between the parties, the judicial mediation department of the Bailiwick also tried to mediate between the parties, but, owing to the differences between them, no agreement was reached. Finally, Mr. Wang indicated that the pet shop would be prosecuted in court.