There's a video of a woman in the Greenfield Central Square at Anhui port who's been squeezing her back when she's fighting over a dog, even when the police are at the scene asking for the dog to be taken away, the woman screams: "I'll kill my dog, I'll kill your child, I'll do a few insignias, I'll do it, I'll pay for tens of millions, I won't get my dog." In this context, one cannot help but reminiscent of the Upper Beach Park, more than 100 years ago, where, between 1900 and 1928, it was reported that a tablet had been hanged and that the book “Chineses and dogs are not allowed in”, which continues to be a source of outrage to countless nations today. However, according to historical records, the first sign that the park did fly had “no access to the bikes and dogs”, while article 5 stated that “no access to the Chinese except for Western domestic servants” and that the processing of articles 1 and 5 into “no access to the Chinese and dogs” was more a source of anger. In 2021, compared to more than a hundred years ago’s humiliations, there were those who shouted “dog lives are more important than human lives” against their own fellow citizens, also causing anger and noise on the part of a large number of Internet users, while the dog owner is said to be the famous owner of the “Break State” dinner. In the new era of full-scale construction of a socialist State governed by the rule of law, the rhetoric and actions of female doggies are naturally offensive.
From a constitutional standpoint, article 33 of the Constitution of the People ' s Republic of China provides that citizens of the People ' s Republic of China are equal before the law. The State respects and guarantees human rights. Any citizen has the rights provided for in the Constitution and the laws, while at the same time fulfilling the constitutional and legal obligations. The female dog owner, who is a Chinese citizen, is clearly not inferior to the law and must fulfil the obligations set out in the Constitution and the laws.
From a civil law point of view, if the dog owner's pet bites other citizens, the corresponding civil liability is incurred. Article 1245 of the Civil Code of the People ' s Republic of China provides that animal breeders and managers shall be held liable for any damage caused by others. Of course, it is possible to prove that the damage was caused by wilful or gross negligence on the part of the person to whom the violation was committed and that liability may be waived or mitigated.
From the standpoint of administrative law, it is clear that the unconscionable words and actions of the female dog owner have violated the administrative order of public order and are suspected of violating article 42 of the Law on the Punishment of Public Security Administration: if one of the following acts is committed, she shall be liable to detention for up to five days or to a fine of up to $500; if the circumstances are serious, she shall be liable to detention for up to five days and a fine of up to five or ten days and shall be liable to a fine of up to $500: (i) writing a letter of intimidation or otherwise threatening the physical integrity of another person; (ii) blatant insult or fabrication of facts against another person; ... it appears from online sources that the female dog owner is subject to administrative detention by the public security authorities and should fall under such an offence.
From a criminal law point of view, the female dog owner is suspected of having committed a criminal offence and is criminally liable if she actually commits a threatening act. Of course, the competent public security organs impose administrative penalties in accordance with the law, without manifest misconduct, if the female dog owner has simply been burned in the head by anger and has threatened others with irrationality in the course of speech and has not committed a threatening act.
In short, in order to fully advance the new era of a State governed by the rule of law, scientific legislation, the strict enforcement of the law and the observance of the law by the entire population are not empty words, and no one, no matter how many yuan in his pocket, can fail to respect the legitimate rights of others, let alone violate the law.
