Recently, a woman in Beijing spent 250,000 successful clones of her dead pet dog, “Rara”, who returned to her arms a year after his death.
The dog master said that because of the moment the dog walked, it was really hard to let go, so he chose cloning.
Such a move has also provoked debate among netizens, who have indicated that it is really necessary to do so, mainly with money.
From the point of view of the dog owner, it would be enough to place feelings on cloned dogs, and there was no need to be too demanding.
From the point of view of the dog, the subjectivity (consciousness) of the cloned dog and the memory of the cloned dog are not the same, nor are they sufficiently continuous and, strictly speaking, not the same dog (human cloning is the same).
In the strict sense of the word, it was unrealistic to seek immortality through cloning, which was a clone and did not allow it to continue.