Ms. Chen, who lives in Deer Town, Wenzhou, fosters her own pagoda and pagoda in a pet shop run by Mr. Chung. The third day of foster care, the dog died. The parties had agreed that Mr. Zheng would pay an amount of $25,000 for one year, which resulted in Mr. Zheng ' s reversal, and that Ms. Chen ' s complaint would bring Mr. Zheng ' s case to court, for a total claimed loss of more than $29,000. In recent days, the Deer City People ' s Court has mediated this service contract dispute and the parties have finally made peace.
On 19 September this year, Miss Chen, who lives in Wenzhou, placed her dog, a Bago dog and a forensic dog, in a pet shop run by Mr. Zheng, at a cost of $60 a day for two dogs.
Ms. Chen said that, on the evening of 20 September, he asked Mr. Chung about the dog and indicated that everything was normal. However, at more than 7 a.m. on 21 September, a voice message from Mr. Chung said that the dog had died. When Ms. Chen arrived at Mr. Cheng ' s place, she found that the other party had no real shop and no business licence, that the dog had a small foster cage and that, by the time she arrived, the dog had begun to attract flies in cold and rigid conditions. Ms. Chen concluded that the dog had been dead for a long time, that when the dog died, Mr. Chung was outside doing other business, and that he was not guarded by a foster dog, the death of which was due to Mr. Chung ' s fault.
Mr. Zheng argued that the death of the Bago dog, who had seen it in a pet hospital before being placed in foster care, showed that there were problems with pre-care health. While he admitted that the dog had died in foster care, he believed that the cause of the dog ' s death could be heat, the dog was overweight, and that his small environment was caused by the absence of air conditioning.
At present, the cause of death cannot be identified because the dead dog has cremated. In the course of the consultations, Ms. Chen suggested that, although the dog had been purchased for 2,500 dollars, she had raised her own for two and a half years with deep feelings and claimed damages for 25,000 yuan from Mr. Chung.
At the outset, Mr. Zheng promised this amount of compensation to be paid within one year. However, after consulting others, Mr. Zheng considered that the sum of $25,000 was excessive and that he was willing to compensate only Ms. Chen for half of the cost of burning the dog by purchasing the dog, which was $2,500.
Failure to negotiate between the parties gave rise to a dispute in which Ms. Chen claimed damages amounting to more than $29,000 for the purchase of pets, two and a half years of maintenance expenses, lost work costs, moral damages and cremation costs.
On 13 November, the Moose City Court opened the case, adopted a legal interpretation and organized mediation between the parties, which culminated in an agreement that Mr. Chung would pay Ms. Chen $10,000 by 18 November.
The judge reminded that in recent years a large number of pet salons or pet lovers, such as others, have carried out pet hosting businesses by advertising pet foster care in micro-cafés, pet web forums or by other means. There is a contractual relationship between the breeder and the pet custodian, and the pet foster care provider, as the provider of foster care, should exercise due care and care. As custodians, care should be taken to select foster institutions with relevant qualifications and to provide suitable spaces, facilities and facilities for pet living. Moreover, Ms. Chen ' s mental suffering was caused by the death of the dog, but since the dispute between Ms. Chen and Mr. Cheng was a contractual dispute, Mr. Zheng should be held liable for breach of contract, in accordance with the relevant provisions of article 107 of our Contract Law, moral damages are generally excluded from liability for breach of contract.