"The pet dog was killed at home" was a hot spot for disease control

In the early hours of 12 November 2021, the client, Miss Fu, was informed that, due to the outbreak control, her residence in the Golden Feng Garden, Upper Yiu Sin region, needed to be isolated from the designated hotel.

Every day, the most interesting and practical psychology.

In recent days, there has been widespread debate about the “segregated pets being killed” in the Xinzhou district of Jiangxi.

Let us begin with a review of specific events:

In the early hours of 12 November 2021, the client, Miss Fu, was informed that, due to the outbreak control, her residence in the Golden Feng Garden, Upper Yiu Sin region, needed to be isolated from the designated hotel.

When Miss Fu asked the staff about the pet dog in the morning, the staff said, "No dog will do anything."

On 12 November, at 14 p.m., Miss Fu arrived at the hotel and confirmed the dog ' s safety through home surveillance. The epidemiological staff said they had helped to see it and closed the door for Miss Fu.

On 12 November, at about 1640 hours, Ms. Fu observed through home surveillance that two staff members wearing white anti-immuno uniforms had broken into her house, hit her on the head with an iron rod and left with the dog, who was still unaware of his fate. Miss Fu contacted the staff at the time, but the response was that the dog had been rendered harmless.

It is also known to journalists that other people living with Ms. Fu at the Golden Phoenix Garden have suffered from a type of evil.

The incident provoked the anger of the netizens after the news, and many felt that dogs could no longer be disposed of without their owners, and that pet dogs were like family members to individuals. Under the pilferage of the disease, the human nature is manifest. It is shameful that some regions use temporary adoption to care for the pets of isolated persons, while others rely on the epidemic to reveal the evil of humanity.

Even the OSA commented on the event, “Putting a pet dog at home”: Don't treat someone else's pets as animals.

It is understood that the prevention and control of the epidemic requires the cooperation of the public, and most of them are doing their best. But we must understand that the very essence of preventing and controlling the epidemic is now for people to be better off and for everyone to be safe.

It should also be part of the job to ensure that the population has a safe and secure life. Ms. Fu only had to go home after 14 days of isolation to live in peace with her dog, and is now in a state of unrest because of the dehumanization of the disease’s personnel, which is indeed an oversight.

In fact, the key point is its ambivalence:

The staff promised not to treat pet dogs, and the other made harmless treatment of dogs. I don't know if it's a lock or not handled enough without everyone's consent.

Inhumanity and lack of consent are the underlying causes of anger. The scale of the epidemic has been difficult and understandable, but it is not necessary or even necessary to kill pet dogs.

In the final analysis, local staff were misperformed and too narrow a view. There are many models of management success across the country on how to deal with pet dogs during isolation, while they use one of the least humane.

Sometimes contradictions are not true, vaccinations and pet dogs are not two incompatible things, and the reason why managers feel the opposite or the other is rooted in the convergence of mindsets and perceptions.

Management is an art, and good managers are good at managing conflicts and learn to “dance in chains”.

Humanization and rationalization are the foundations for successful and effective institutionalization, and if a manager pursues institutionalization in a way that does not value humanization, he is ultimately doomed to an ideal outcome.

Because, regardless of whether the disease is prevented or any other social work involving management, whatever its purpose, it is ultimately at the mercy of the people.

So it is on the basis of the success of things, and the purpose of governance is nothing less than security. People can only accept redeployments on a voluntary basis to meet organizational requirements.

In the process of well-being, management has to learn to adapt and adapt. The middleman said: “The learned, the interrogated, the thought, the discerning, the determined.”

Whether it is a broad-based learning process, a careful learning process or a careful thinking process of identification and practical action, these need to be done individually, and practice is the source of all truth.

If a principle did not work in practice or was difficult to produce satisfactory results, it should be changed rather than pursued in a deliberate manner, apparently because the market was too corrupt and ignored humanity in the administration.

The subject of quality in the book " The Future of Quality and Quality " is human and the core of management is human. People must be targeted, not means.

Each person has specific needs, quantitative goals, and it is vital that these basic needs of humanity be taken into account in the integrated management of society, which are essential elements of successful management.

At present, the Office of the Commanding Officer of the West Street Epidemic Control and Control of the City of Sinzhou, Upper Yiu, informs that the persons concerned have been educated to be critical, have been removed from their posts and have been instructed to apologize sincerely to them.

The outcome of the final disposition is a daunting one, and it is to be hoped that other social administrations will be able to take this into account in their future work and be fully human-based rather than one-size-fits-all, while valuing the lives of other species, some of which are not impossible but require more patience and compassion on the part of managers.

From time immemorial to the present, “grateful politics” has been the most effective way of managing.