In recent days, in the streets of Shaankang, an angry incident took place when, at around 4 a.m., a man went out to walk his dog while it was not dawn, walking alone without a mask or dog rope. This was followed by a brutal scene: the dog he raised, met with a tan-coloured stray dog, followed by a mad torn fight.
It is clear from the surveillance video that the man did not stop and even took his mobile phone and filmed it, and that, in the end, his strong dog “winnered” the bite and killed the stray dog alive. In the face of such bloody images, not only did the dog owner not pull out, but he was also excited to “see the game” and his mindset was chilling.
Following a report from a citizen, the man was summoned at the first time by the public security authorities in Hamburg and, according to the information received, his last name was Wang, who explained that he had stopped in the morning but failed to do so, and gave up. Furthermore, his explanation for the video was even more absurd when the man stated that he had taken the video and retained the evidence because he feared that the stray dog might be the owner.
Clearly, the reason for this is too pale to be able to raise a dog of its own for many years, to watch the dog fight in a calm way, and say that the video was made to save evidence. Is it not responsible for the dog to bite the dog? Many netizens believe that the dog's owner is clearly condoning, or even nurturing, the wildness of the dog, using the innocent stray dog as a “rat” while no one else is on the street, and that the disregard for life is outraged.
In addition, during the exceptional period of anti-preventable disease, some of Wang's dogs are not wearing the required masks, are loosely dispersed, and are subjected to irregularities in the raising of dogs, the failure to obtain a dog certificate, the failure to hold dogs in the leash while walking, and irregularities, as well as condoning the killing of stray dogs by domestic dogs. Moreover, a number of people who know dogs remind them that it is a danger to public safety to go out without a chain of dogs that are brutal and wild and that, once they are bitten, they will not let go and even dare to fight with the hideout.
Currently, the police station educates the King about the absence of masks and captures and transfers to the holding station the bit dogs he has. But even so, it remains difficult for civilians to complain.
Is there not enough lesson to be learned from the exposure of this event, once again alerting to the quality of the dog-bearers and the numerous previous incidents of dog-walking? And this time, the owner of the dog watched in cold blood as a life disappeared, and the culprit was the dog that he had raised all the time. No wonder a friend of the Internet said, "It tastes blood today and bites you tomorrow."
The regulation of dogs is already in place, but it has not been implemented successfully. It has been followed by the introduction of dog-keeping regulations, and there are clear regulations for the prohibition of dogs, although regulations vary from place to place, and there are many restrictions on enforcement. In addition, there are places where strong dogs are permitted, which limit the time spent walking dogs, such as between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. the next day, when it is clear that Wang somehow took advantage of the space to “street hunting” in the early morning.
We have no objection to dogs, and this society will respect the rights of every man who loves dogs. It is just that if a dog is used as a tool to exaggerate their “wrong thoughts”, and if a dog is based on disrespect for the lives of other dogs, then such a person is not worthy of being the dog's master.