Old dog likes me back, low in the coat. Dogs are not too poor to be happy with each other, even if they never meet again. There's always been a connection between man and dog.
The dog's life is short, the 13th and 24th years are lifetimes, and that's what a dog's company is for a while. They may not know much, but they remain loyal to their masters. So the hyenas were not among the few.
But in the face of such a small and lovely animal, people still choose to do harm. In the last century, scientists chose to experiment with dogs to prove that smoking was harmless, so that they could smoke 100 cigarettes a day for three consecutive years without interruption. Such experiments are inhuman, dead dog rights.
"Smoking Hounds."
In 1975, a story about “smoking, dogs and experiments” was published in the British press, and this was followed by an article entitled “Smoking dogs”, which gave rise to numerous national legislation prohibiting the use of animals by tobacco companies for tobacco-gas experiments.
If Mary Beith, who did not speak out, perhaps the tragic history of the dog would have been sealed and buried forever.
The whole article revolved around the tragic experiment with dogs, and the brave female journalist, knowing that her story would be against the interests of the tobacco giants, still chose to make it public. In addition to her sympathy for the tragedy of the dogs, she wanted to guarantee the right of citizens to know.
In the article, Mary made public the fact that scientists would slit the dog's throat and then use professional instruments to force dogs to smoke 100 cigarettes a day. During the experiment, dogs will continue to die and dogs who can survive three years of repeated prison life every day will also be killed.
And for that reason, it's the destruction. Scientists are doing the experiment itself with the help of tobacco giants, and the results that tobacco companies, on the other hand, want to obtain from them cannot necessarily be allowed to make the presence of the dogs public.
And Mary did a lot to get these facts.
It's the age of the truth.
Cigarettes are today, but in less than 200 years of history, they were first born on 25 June 1843. Before that, tobacco had been widely cultivated and promoted by the colonizers, of course, but it was also emerging as a product of cigarettes.
Later, cigarettes became widespread, people became obsessed with the joy of the fog and there was even a feeling that Tanner could lead himself out of a moment of distress and anxiety. For example, Luxhen is an old smoker, who barely leaves his hands. In the end, he died of cigarettes.
The first people didn't know about the dangers of cigarettes. There must be a debugging process for all new things from the beginning to the beginning. People are obsessed with the pleasure of smoking cigarettes, but they are selective in ignoring the harm that they may cause, which may, of course, not have been anticipated.
However, as smoking continues to become widespread, many health problems are highlighted. Gradually, experts have begun to pay attention to the phenomenon and, through long-term surveys, sampling and research, have developed the possibility of cigarette hazards, but nothing is conclusive.
Before and after the 1950s, the American Cancer Society, after a long investigation, finally released a cautious message that smoking could cause cancer. As soon as the news came out, society was in turmoil. After all, cancer is a terrible existence in any age.
But before life, even if cigarettes are as good as they are, most people are discouraged. As a result, the cigarette market suffered a huge shock. It is natural that the tobacco giants respond to this situation and, ultimately, they decide to use “science against science”.
What is science against science? It is to hire a large number of researchers to study the vulnerability of cigarettes to cancer, it being understood that the tobacco companies have a clear purpose and that their results are clear. All the laboratories employed also know the attitude of the employer, and “no influence” is the only conclusion of the experiment.
In Western countries where human rights were paramount, scientists were naturally afraid to use human experiments, and they turned to dogs. Later, countless dogs were subjected to 100 cigarettes per day.
It's not known that even if it's the same as life, there's a difference between the dog and the human body. Drugs that work, for example, in the human body may not apply above the dog body. Thus, even a conclusion on the body of the dog cannot prove anything entirely.
Moreover, these experimental data are themselves decorative, faked and decorative. The sole purpose of this experiment is to satisfy the interests of the tobacco industry through dog abuse.
Everything would have been done in secret, blindly trusting the conclusion of the experiment published by the tobacco company — smoking does not induce cancer, but little attention is paid to all the processes behind the experiment. Until Mary appeared, she had first born a calf fearing the tiger and had just entered the journalistic profession with a heart for justice. She was naturally very active when the leader was interested in mining tobacco companies for experiments.
In order to blend into the laboratory, Mary dressed herself and eventually helped as a candidate. And the job is to bind the dogs and put them on the operating table. In the laboratory, she had to watch the dogs suffer inhuman treatment, but was powerless.
Mary was aware that the only way to save the dogs was to make the truth public at an early date, and she took a number of secret photographs of the experiment over the course of many days and asked a number of testers about the results of the experiment. According to the experimenters, most of the dogs died inland for three years and the few who survived would be killed after three years.
One of the scientists revealed that he had dissected the body of an experimental dog who had been smoking cigarettes for three years and found that all the tissues in his body had suffered extensive damage. When a dog smokes cigarettes at an advanced stage, the smoke mask acts as a respirator. Owing to the erosion of 100 cigarettes per day, the test dogs are already overburdened and unable to breathe normally.
One hundred cigarettes a day are consumed by experimental dogs that have survived for three years, which together amount to 109,500 cigarettes. It's such a huge amount that it hurts. And such inhuman experiments have come to the conclusion that nothing is better than the heart of the giant tobacco.
When Mary made this cruel experiment public, he issued successive statements that did not allow any animal to be used for tobacco and gas experiments. In the case of cigarettes, people are becoming aware of their dangers, but the smokers are always present, and the phrase “smoking harmful to health” is long gone.
In retrospect, those experimental dogs were already overburdened by the daily erosion of cigarettes, which were ignored. All human beings are equal, and those who are superior animals must learn to treat all human beings equally, not the lives of others.