There is a certain responsibility for the car accident of the dog owner, and it is incumbent upon them to keep an eye on them and not to go anywhere. Otherwise, there will be a dispute. In recent days, there has been an altercation between the owner of the car and the owner of the dog over a car accident with a bologna dog.
Back-to-back, weenie.
On 27 February, a woman reported to the police that, in the afternoon, while her daughter was walking his dog in the district, a Land Cruiser drove his dog back and ran away. According to the registration number of the Land Cruiser provided by the woman, the civilian police contacted Zhao Bin, the owner of the vehicle, who had caused the accident. According to witness statements and video footage from the scene, Zhao Bin admitted that he had killed his pet dog, “when he did not notice his car rolling into the dog, I would not have left the scene if I had known to do so.” Zhao Bin said.
As can be seen from the surveillance footage, a teenage girl standing far away, a salami pet dog running alone near Zhao Bin's Land Cruiser, did not find anything unusual when Zhao Bin turned his car upside down, “This dog has been in our care for over a year, is deeply emotional, and he needs to pay us $1,500 in damages.” The woman filed a claim for compensation, but Zhao Bin did not accept it, “Although I killed the puppy, the price you offered was too high; Besides, why don't you tie up the dog as the dog's owner?
[Subject] Unsatisfied dog liability.
Zhao Bin's objection is reasonable. According to the Civil Police, article 12 of the Programme for the Management of Dogs in the Municipal District of Texas of 21 August 2010 provides that dogs shall not be allowed to travel to public places, and that the time of walking dogs shall be between nineteen and seven o ' clock the following day, and that when walking dogs must bear immunisation signs and canine plates, the dog shall bear only a chain of bean dogs and be held by a person with full civilian capacity.
The woman did not go to the relevant department to carry out the graft procedure for the dog, nor did she walk the dog at the appointed time, and most importantly, did not use the rope to hold her as a “guardian” of the dog, for which she was responsible. “With regard to the extent of responsibility for dogs, who are not required to be responsible, the law does not contain a clear delineation of responsibility. Zhao Bin paid 500 yuan to the woman, after consultation with the civilian police.