It's a stray dog who bites me! Shao Xian, the man thinks he's worse than a twat, because the stray dog bites people, but he's liable. Here's the thing: Suh-ichi is a dog-loving man who usually sees stray dogs in the neighborhood and comes out with dog food to feed. For a long time, the stray dog came to Seo's house on time, waiting for him to feed him. Moreover, when he walks his own dog, he sometimes walks with him. One day, while the residents of the neighbourhood were on a walk, they passed by the entrance to Xu ' s house and encountered a stray dog waiting to be fed. When the stray dog met Fang-i, he started squeezing his teeth and then jumped on to bite one of his sides. One of them, who believed that the biter ' s stray dog had been fed, demanded some compensation for his medical expenses. Suh, for his part, believed that the bite was a stray dog, not a dog he raised, and refused compensation. Consultations between the parties on the issue of compensation had not been successful, and a single petition would be filed in court. After a hearing, the court found that Suh had developed a de facto rearing relationship with a stray dog and finally awarded him a fee of more than 3,000 for medical treatment. "Advocacy" wants to come to this place, to feed stray dogs out of love and kindness, without wanting to put himself in court and to lose money. It's a bad thing to do! But objectively, the court ruled that Xu should pay for some medicine. Why do you say that? Under the Civil Code, animal breeders are liable for abuse if they cause damage to others; however, it can be shown that the damage was caused by wilful or gross negligence on the part of the victim, and that responsibility may be waived or mitigated. Thus, whether Suh was the breeder of the stray dog involved in the case and whether the bite of the stray dog involved in the case was the result of a deliberate or gross negligence on the part of the party concerned was the key to the case. Is Seo-ichi the breeder of stray dogs? It is generally understood that stray dogs are those who do not have owners and breeders and who earn their own living. This is also why Suh has always stressed that he is not the breeder of stray dogs. However, the situation in this case is more specific. As a result of the regular feeding of stray dogs by Xu for a long period of time, they sometimes walk with their own dogs. As a result, the stray dog came to Xu's house at a relatively fixed time, waiting to be fed. As a result, a de facto breeding relationship has developed between Tsui and the case involving stray dogs. As a result, it can be concluded that Xu was involved in the case of a stray dog. 2. Is it due to a wilful or gross negligence on the part of the party involved in a vagrant dog bite? Where it is established that the case involves the de facto breeder of a stray dog, Xu is in principle liable for the violation, unless it can be established that the case was committed by a stray dog for the purpose or by gross negligence of the party. However, Suh has failed to substantiate that a case involving a vagrancy dog was the result of a deliberate or gross negligence of the party, and that therefore only the adverse legal consequences of the inability to prove can be borne. In the present case, therefore, the court ruled that the loss of certain medical expenses of the party in compensation was in full conformity with the law. What kind of legal inspiration does this give us? In real life, there are a lot of dog lovers like Suh, and we often see a little video from some of our netizens that feeds stray dogs. But through this case, we know that if you regularly and regularly feed stray dogs, you may be identified as a de facto breeder of stray dogs. If the stray dog you feed bites the others, you may have to pay for the stray dog. So, if you really have this kind of love and the conditions allow it, it's recommended that a stray dog be adopted so that it has a safe home, rather than simply feeding it. Otherwise, it is prone to the consequences of good intentions. What do you think about that?
