As the pet owner.
I didn't put my dog on a leash.
And after the dispute.
Ask the neighbors to apologize to their dog?
There's no dog in the elevator.
"Can't be called an animal"?
Mr. Gao told journalists that, on the night of 30 June, when the mother and her 4-year-old daughter were about to take the elevator home, a woman with a small pet dog was found in it. Because the dog was not tied, Mr. Gao's mother, fearing that his granddaughter would be injured by the dog, then stung his foot off the dog and said that the dog should be tied, “after all, he was a animal and could easily bite sexually”. And that's what made the dog owner disgruntled and there was a conversation in the elevator.
The surveillance video showed that the parties were deadlocked at the elevator for about six minutes, during which the dog owner kept the elevator under control and prevented the elderly and children from leaving the elevator. Later, Mr. Gao came by a telephone call from his mother, and according to live video, after leaving the elevator, there was again a conflict of words between the two sides as to whether or not to apologize to the dog. The owner insisted that the old man should apologize to the dog, while Mr. Gao stated that the dog owner's practice of not hanging the dog was suspected of violating the regulations, while the owner responded that “the law is what you can do to me”.
Subsequently, the police officers of the police station arrived at the scene for on-site mediation, but there was no agreement between the parties.
Owner of the dog: The pet dog is called a beast.
Apologize is kind of angry.
With regard to Mr. Gao ' s claim, Ms. Zhang, the owner of the dog, stated that it was true. However, Ms. Zhang believed that, although the pet dog was not tied at the time of the incident, when she entered the elevator she held the dog in her arms and could have taken another lift if the elderly feared that the child would be injured by the dog.
As to her own request for an apology from the old man to the dog, Ms. Chang explained that her pet dog had been in the category of a “old dog” for nine years, because it had a deep relationship with the dog and could not be accepted as a “beast dog”, while Ms. Chang interpreted the way in which people apologized to the dog as “just talking” and that the two parties stood still and were angry.
At the same time, Ms. Zhang says, "You're the winner of the law." This statement was prompted by inappropriate language in the event of a dispute between the parties, and Ms. Zhang was convinced that she was well founded.
At the same time, Ms. Zhang stated that Mr. Gao and his family had verbally abused and intimidated themselves in the community of owners of the subdistricts after the incident. According to Ms. Zhang ' s interview with the proprietors, Mr. Gao ' s family threatened to kill pet dogs in the group. Ms. Zhang indicated that her personal information had also been made public by Mr. Gao and her family because of the incident, which was suspected of violating the right to privacy and did not, in any event, preclude the use of legal weapons to defend her rights.
Local police station: "People apologize to dogs" is an unreasonable request.
According to the Liaoning local regulations on dog management in Liaoning province, which were implemented on 1 May 2015:
(a) The home of a dog shall be accompanied by a dog, a chain of dogs, accompanied or accompanied by a person with full civil capacity, and shall bear the dog registration certificate;
(b) The presence of dogs should be avoided for the elderly, persons with disabilities, pregnant women and children;
A dog travelling in an elevator or on or off stairs should avoid peak hours and take the initiative to avoid others, and should wear a holster or be packed in a canine cage.
It is clear that Ms. Zhang has acted in violation of these three provisions.
On 5 July, a journalist called the police station of Long Feng, the police station of the police station in East China, who stated that he had intervened in the mediation, that Ms. Zhang ' s request for an apology from the elderly to the dog was unjustified and that the police did not support it, and that the relevant surveillance had been called and was being further investigated.