In recent days, an outraged human-dog conflict has generated widespread online debate. The way things are going, the attitude of the dog owner has provoked the outrage of the netizens!
At that time, a dog without a leash suddenly attacked the child. At one point, the father of the child, out of instinct, quickly reached out to try to separate the dog and protect the child from harm. This would have been the most normal way for a father to take care of a child, but what happened was completely unexpected.
Instead of restraining and reflecting on the behaviour of their own dogs, the dog owners went out of their way, punching their fathers indiscriminately and beating them to the ground. That pretentious attitude, as if he were the aggrieved party, ignored the dangers facing the child and the legitimate defence of the father.
"What kind of dog does he have?" Even if the dog didn't actually attack the child, what would be wrong if the father saw the dog suddenly running to the child to separate the dog from his feet to protect the child's instinct? But the dog owner was so unreasonable and unacceptable.
“Showing a dog is more careful than protecting a child, and there is no doubt that such a person doesn't have a child at home, so he has no idea how to take care of the child.” Indeed, protecting his pets is indefensible, but only if the dog does not harm others. The difference between a dog and a human being is the most basic of all, but the owner of the dog seems completely ignorant.
From a legal standpoint, it is clear that the father of the child is in self-defence when he separates the dog from his feet. However, the owner of the dog has been violent in attacking him, and such acts of flight must be severely punished, otherwise he will only be more apocalyptic and arrogant.
In this case, we saw an irresponsible dog owner whose behaviour not only harmed the father of the child but also called into question the quality of the dogkeeper. It was to be hoped that the authorities concerned would take the matter seriously, give the victims an impartial account and send a clear message to society that any violation of public decency or harm to others would not be tolerated.