Story one:
On 26 June 2020, a man on a motorcycle met a dog without a dog rope and died after an accident. The driver ' s family, believing that the owner of the dog had failed to meet the corresponding management obligations and was liable for the accident, sued him to the court for over 1.57 million yuan.
The scratches and bites of pedestrians, the crashes of elderly children, traffic accidents and the bites of other dogs have been repeated in recent years as a result of accidents and disputes over the absence of dog ropes.
Several judges pointed out that pet owners carrying pets to the outdoors should take measures such as canine ropes in accordance with the law to prevent dogs from hurting people, with particular attention to groups such as the elderly and the sick and the sick. Under the relevant legal provisions, such as the Civil Code, the Animal Disease Act, the owner of a pet is liable for damage caused by another person, and it is difficult to obtain compensation for damage caused to the dog by the absence of a dog rope.
Story two:
Li was walking his own teddy dog in the garden in the same district and Ho was walking the Haschi that he raised. Hadzie suddenly bit Teddy, and Lee went up there and tried to take Teddy away, and he was not careful to get his arm bit by Haskid, and both sides called the police.
Upon arrival, the civilian police found out that Ho Hasky had no dog certificates, contacted the staff concerned to ban Haski and brought Lee and Ho to the police station for questioning. On the same day, Li went to the hospital for medical expenses of $132.149, including vaccination against rabies and protein, and took Teddy to the Petty Hospital, where Teddy was diagnosed as having broken spines, at a total cost of $15906. Whether Haski was too vicious or Teddy was the one who started the trouble, and there was a dispute between the two sides that Li would bring the case to court. After the court has heard, it is decided whichever bears full liability.
The Assistant Judge of the People ' s Court of the Western City of Beijing stated that, in accordance with the relevant provisions of laws and regulations, such as the Civil Code of the People ' s Republic of China, the Regulations on the Management of Dogs in the City of Beijing, animal breeders or managers should adopt safety measures for animals, when carrying dogs out of the house, they should be subject to dog ropes and should avoid the elderly, the disabled, pregnant women and children. The plaintiff, Li, carried a teddy dog out of the country, and the defendant was not bound by a canine rope. In addition, Haschi is a medium-sized dog with a high duty of care. Thus, the court decided which was to assume full liability.