It's been a while since we've all been waiting for our mother's birthday. As soon as this 11th holiday arrives, many of my little plowing friends are getting happy.
At first, the scavengers traveled with the pets, and the scavengers were prepared for any of them early, and each of them walked with its own rats on their journey as soon as summer break arrived.
I may be envious of them, but my own dog is too fat to eat a lot of food and not walk a long way, so it's just to be a waiter and a pooper.
Out of goodness, I am about to take note of the past one by one, and the scavenging officials are with me one by one, and I will see it when I know it's correct. And there's always a shit-throwing officer who suddenly asked me a question before he left:
"Well, does he say he can make dogs eat wild mushrooms outside?"
I also responded to him at the time, even though there was no scientific argument that a dog must not eat mushrooms, but I ended up out on the outskirts, knowing if the mushrooms in front of me were poisonous mushrooms, so I still didn't propose to shovel a dog.
He said, "I know the truth, and I've read a text saying that it's okay to eat mushrooms on the outskirts of a dog, and we'll be perfectly comfortable together."
He said, "I can't help myself: What is it?" Send it to me. I want to see who the hell is there.
I read that article later, and it felt so good and funny. Soon after the article was published, two observations were made to confirm that dogs were free to eat mushrooms outside the country. In the first place, the fact that the body structure of a human being is different from that of a dog, that when people are poisoned, dogs are not necessarily poisoned, and that many of the mushrooms in the suburbs often have bite marks of insects and rats, is all the more proof of the idea of “my poison.”
On the other hand, dogs, who are trained as small animals, are born to identify harmful and non-toxic foods, and can search for poisons themselves even if they are poisoned.
Tell the truth, I'm pissed off by rumors like that. If a shit-throwing officer believed anything like that, then the dog's life would be at risk and crying wouldn't work! It is therefore imperative that today I seriously and seriously reject this rumour and give everyone one truth.
According to the publishers, the body structure of a human being is different from that of a dog, so that some mushrooms are poisoned after eating and dogs are not necessarily poisoned. But I have to say, all I can say is that he has too little expertise in organic chemistry and molecular biology.
There are many references that highlight the fact that more than 90 per cent of the world ' s mushrooms were poisoned with deadly carcasses as a result of toxic fungus. It's not this kind of mushroom, it's just some of the mushrooms in the Amanita section Phallodeae.
And what about the toxic side effects of this toxic goose ointment? The lethal internal toxin contained in the toxic fungus is the oste and ghost pentex, which, when they enter the human body of the microbe, are integrated with the RNA polymerase in the body cells, thus preventing the RNA polymerase from producing the RNA chain. As a result, the generation of human protein has been blocked.
Inadequate availability of protein can also contribute to the suppression of all chemical substances, such as hemoprotein, carbohydrates and condensers, generated in the liver. Also, when the osteoporium causes toxic side effects in the liver, it enters with the RNA polymerase into the colon and is then digested and re-infected, cycling to the human body.
According to the central law of genetic material expression, the DNA of the body of a nuclear organism is transcribed into RNA and subsequently translated into Chinese to produce protein. So, in basic theory, all the real nuclear organisms (which basically contain all the microbes) are exposed to the toxic fungus.
Perhaps insects and people's vertebrates were separated hundreds of millions of years ago, and their physiological characteristics differ considerably from those of people or dogs. Some of the insects do resist the harmful effects of the toxic goose ointment, but it is their unique ability to work and does not mean all the microbes.
And rats are one of the vertebrates, and I don't feel very resilient to the toxic fungus. For the reasons why there are bite marks on the poison mushrooms, according to some natural Zoologicalists, they mark the poison mushrooms on the basis of the bite marks. It was not easy for them to eat the mushrooms at that time, leaving only one mark and leaving with a spanking.
Thus, dogs and people, despite their different physical configurations, function in the most basic microorganisms. They are unlikely to be resistant to poison mushrooms.
It appears that it is difficult to find examples of insects and rats in the manuscripts to prove that dogs are free to eat mushrooms.
It also mentioned that dogs were able to identify harmful and non-toxic foods and that even if poisoned, they could find their own insight into poisons. It is even more absurd to say that some wildlife do have the ability to work to identify harmful foods, but this capacity is usually taught by members of the population (the vast majority of older small animals).
And the pet dog in the family has never lived in the wild, and there are no outings. Who can teach him that? Stop messing around and the shit-popping officer doesn't know.
And it's not really a scientific argument that dogs are free to search for poison. It may be true that out-of-country animals have work experience in finding poison herbs, but it is the same as in the upper part of the country, where pet dogs do not have the same teachers to educate them, so they are helpless to cope with poisoning.
I've made a false story about that article, and there may be a lot of poking officials here who would like to ask what kind of way to identify the poison mushrooms and the usual mushrooms. I think I want to tell you that bacteria like mushrooms have evolved over the course of hundreds of years, and have created a lot of different kinds, and it is unlikely that they can be identified in a few simple ways.
Therefore, if you are not authoritative experts at the relevant level, and you encounter unknown wild mushrooms, it would be better to go far away and never let dogs eat. You know, mushrooms don't eat well, heaven is early.
It's important to spend summer vacations and to have a good time with a dog, but relative to that is to ensure safety. Risk-specific matters must be bypassed immediately, so don't take these rumours lightly, otherwise doing it means killing dogs.