If a beloved pet is lost,
The master is as anxious as the child is missing.
It's hard to find someone else to love.
And he's been asked to pay a high price.
Are you giving or not?
In the past few days, there has been another “dog-picking” incident in Guangxi Nanning, and even a “Ho-Hong II” has almost appeared.
Ying is the owner of a barber shop in Nanning, which has a male pup named Timo. Timo generally operates freely in a barber shop and is known as the “boss manager” by employees and customers.
On the afternoon of 16 March, Timo was lost playing near the barbershop. On the other hand, Yoon posted the dog-hunt in the district where the barber shop was located, with a sign that the dog was wearing a collar and a suspension. He's got his contact on the chandelier.
On the afternoon of 18 March, we were contacted via Twitter. The tweets provided by Yoon indicate that the other party claimed that the dog was in the hands of her friend and sent pictures of Timo. At the same time, the other party offered her $4,500 as compensation for the dog.
It felt too much at $4,500, offered compensation at the price of foster care at the pet shop, and thanked the other party for a red bag. Subsequently, Oyang tried to persuade the other party, from both a polite and a legal point of view, that the other party ' s actions were illegal appropriation of the property of others and that he could call the police to settle them.
When he heard it, he said, "Then I'll let him wander tonight."
After a soft little dress, asking how the deal was made, the other side said, "Money transfer, I put the dog in one place and get it myself." Xiaoyang expressed his distrust of this approach and the other side subsequently hacked him.
After learning that there is little hope for a dog to come back,
Little Yang's anger has exposed chat records.
Some of the content was reproduced by some microblogging bloggers.
It was a lively discussion online.
Ying published his own conversation with each other in the circle of friends.
Many netizens are fighting this girl who found a dog.
@Sweetman: This woman is disgusting, disgusting human, worse than dogs!
@Rebecca WXM: Is there a lack of money to this extent? Do you want to threaten the money with another's pet dog? It's worse than a monster!
@Adandan's one-on-one: The dog was so cute, he went to the hairdresser twice, and I didn't think he'd been picked up by such a bad woman.
♪ Don't put water in my drink ♪
@La 8: Feels like this could be a new kind of kidnapping for ransom and sell it to the original owner for more money. There's a lot of people out there who might be dealing with the kidnapping of a child.
When I reach the home star, you're dead: Why are so many psychos in the world like this?
Some netizens think the deterioration is related to the way the dog master talks.
@xxxlll: Isn't the master supposed to be grateful for having found your dog?
@LiYoo666: At first, the dog owner spoke a little harshly, causing discomfort to others, not to be angry, not to make money, not to break the law, not to say to negotiate, to talk to each other, to step by step, to break the line, so the dog owner has a little bit of a lack of intelligence.
@Tammy: I don't know why I'm saying this, but if you want to get your lost pet back, you should be calm and talk about it. You're the one who lost your own kid. What's going on?
Late in the night of 18 March, the other party again approved the application of his friend from Xiaoyang. In subsequent communications, the other side said, “Wait for her body to be collected”, “I'll send you the location of the body by then”, “I don't want the money, I want him dead. You'll regret it."
On the other hand, he said that he had softened his attitude following his offer to withdraw micro-intelligence and make a public announcement that would eliminate the influence of public opinion. “And then the other side stopped asking for money and said it was sure that Timo would be returned to me.
This afternoon, Yan told the morning reporter that Timo had returned safely.
“The other party did not appear, but instead tied the dog to the sky garden on the roof of the subdistrict.” Xiaoyang immediately took Timo to the pet hospital for an examination, “I don't know what he fed Timo, but there are no signs of ill-treatment for the time being, except for some problems with excretion”.
However, the matter was not closed. The search found that the incident had attracted considerable attention after it had been reproduced through several prominent local microblogs in Nanning.
In the comments on microblogging, it was questioned that it was an incident that Yoyo had planned for himself and that he had distributed a micro-mail chat with the other party on the content of the settlement.
The screenshot consists of two images, one of which is based on a micro-letter from Xiaoyang and the other on a micro-mail from the other.
The two screenshots were identical, in which Yoon and Yoon spoke to each other as their bosses and brothers, and first congratulated Timo on his tweets, becoming a net red dog, and then sent a micro-red envelope to each other, saying, “Good job, no mistake. Tomorrow's work depends on you."
Yoon said he did not know who made the two screenshots, but they were absolutely random. "The simplest thing is that my phone is Andre's phone, but both of them are apple phone interfaces, and at least the one with my microphone as its main interface must have been forged."
But Chief has another question.
Isn't it illegal to find something?
From the two-haired communication process, it became clear that the dog was owned and that the owner had repeatedly offered her return. In any case, therefore, she should return the dog in time, and she could request that reasonable expenses such as the consumption of dog food be paid in lieu of persons.
But if it is not returned, it is the illegal possession of the property of others and constitutes an offence!
The crime of misappropriation, which is expressly provided for in article 270 of our Criminal Code, is the act of taking possession of property, the forgotten belongings of others, the buried objects and the refusal to return them for the purpose of illegal possession. Any person suspected of committing such an offence shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, to detention or to a fine, and to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years and not exceeding five years, if the amount is substantial or if there are other aggravating circumstances.
The General Principles of the Civil Code and the Property Code make it clear that the collection of property lost by another person must be returned, that compensation may be negotiated with the missing person if the cost of transportation, etc. is incurred during the custody process, and that if the person who collected the goods is refused to return it, the taking of the owner is a clear act of extortion, and that the missing person may report it to the public security authorities and hold him criminally liable.
Failure to return illicitly acquired property in a timely manner constitutes a crime of appropriation. The crime of misappropriation is the illegal possession, for the purpose of illegal possession, of the property of another person or of the forgotten or buried property of another person, in larger amounts, and the refusal to return such property shall be punishable by imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, by detention or by a fine, and by imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years and not exceeding five years, if the amount is substantial or if other aggravating circumstances are present, with a fine.