There are many potential risks to driving cars on the road, not only by pedestrians, but also by small animals. In recent days, while passing through the intersection, a car owner hit a dog in the red light and, in an unsure manner, reprimanded her. The hostess claimed that her dog was a superior breed and also called the driver blind and claimed him $180,000.
The owner of the vehicle stated that he was in the state of a green light, but that a puppy had suddenly appeared on a zebra line, which, after repeated confirmation, was red and was not followed by anyone. At a time when the owner felt so scared that she didn't get too far away from panic, a lady came running in a hurry and ran into the window, screaming in her mouth, you didn't even have eyes.
At that time, the dog had been hit and the owner of the vehicle had explained that the dog had broken through the red light and had been left unattended, thus causing the accident. The dog owner felt that the responsibility for this was entirely on the side of the car and repeatedly stressed that his dog species were noble. The owner could not help but say that, if you need compensation, I could come up with something to comfort you, and I didn't expect the lady to speak out and claim at least $180,000.
How can the lady say the $180,000 when the owner is in a state of panic and her car is not worth $180,000? Look at this dog's worth thousands of dollars. Did the lady keep feeding the dog for years, making it so expensive? Even more outraged by the fact that his own commitment to compensation was merely a humanitarian act, which was fundamentally not a mistake of his own, leaving his dog untied, causing confusion on the road and not claiming moral damages from his dog owner.
The two people had been arguing on the road, and the woman had repeatedly reaffirmed that her dog was unique, that $180,000 was polite and that the owner had to go to the police. And the traffic police have given a welcome verdict that, although the pet dog was killed, the dog was not tied up on the road or ran through a red light, so that no driver should pay for it, and since the dog should be taken care of and should not wait until an accident has occurred to blackmail others.
Initially, there was a close relationship between humans and pet dogs, and we also considered dogs to be the most loyal friend of humanity, but the hostess was obviously irresponsible. How can you see and evaluate the fact that your own dog, after having been hit by a red light, has spoken too little to the owner of the car, and even blackmailed, should be punished by law for her irrational behaviour?