Recently, in Henan Luoyang, Ms. Wang sent pets and potatoes to bathe in the pet shop, but after a while, the pet store called and said, "The dog's tongue is a little broken." The woman took the dog home, found it not only bloody, but refused to open her eyes and realized that it was wrong. She went to the pet hospital with her dog. I didn't know that she had heard from the pet shop: don't go to the hospital, it's all for money.
It's really incomprehensible that pet dogs have blood in their mouths and can't open their eyes. For pet owners, they don't know what's going on, they have to go to the hospital to treat the dog, but the pet shop says the hospital is full of money.
Even after the dog owner went to the pet hospital and diagnosed the dog as an anemic ulcer, it cost $607. The pet shop said that it could keep the documents and sue the pet hospital for the money, because, in the view of the pet shop, it was a bottle of eyeful. After two days, the dog owner found that the dog's eyes were open, and when the tongue was out, it was visible and the tongue was missing. Now, the pet shop's gone.
In words, the pet shop is clearly exonerating responsibility, and he is typical for shifting the dog owner's attention and trying to get the dog owner to “unify” with them and sue the pet hospital for money. Such demented behaviour can be understood by a reasonable person to the effect that the pet shop is trying to create a “care” image of the dog, taking advantage of the concerns of the dog owner and diverting the focus of the problem, with the ultimate aim of not compensating the dog owner.
In fact, the role of the pet shop in this matter is to transform itself from an injured person to a caring person, to minimize the permanent harm to the dog by word, and to magnify the $607 spent by the dog owner at the pet hospital. What exactly did you say?
The pet store stressed that, in essence, we were all dog-friendly, hoping the dog would be okay, so there was no contradiction in the original intent. So what they're willing to accept is that the dogs show no problems with their eyes first, so they recommend eye drops to the pet hospital, but the dog owner goes to the pet hospital, and eventually only puts on the “not the national standard of veterinary medicine”, so if the dog's eyes follow, it has nothing to do with the pet store.
If you think about pet stores, there's no logic. Is that really the drug? How can they sue the pet hospital? Moreover, dogs have more than eye problems, and more importantly, their tongues have been cut off by pet shops. After the bath, did the hair cut money already include in the shower project? Whether the owner of the dog is informed about the cut is different from the cut.
Many said that it was also irresponsible for the owner of the dog not to be present at the time, to throw it directly to the pet store and to pick it up later. In response to such comments, individuals believe, first, that most pet shops do not allow dog owners to watch baths because dogs see their owners and baths are less controlled and consume more time and energy;
Second, the pet shop beauty project is run by professionals, at least they're well-established, and if the dog owner has the time and the skills to bathe the dog hair, they're not willing to come to the pet shop, and after all, the dog has the stress. So, the absence of the pet owner is precisely the reason she trusted the shop, which led to negligence.
Of course, the problem of higher fees in pet hospitals has persisted, for example, in terms of personal experience: for the first 30 dollars, after a later card, 10 dollars, and for pet owners, tests, treatments can only be “passively accepted” or “opt-out”, and the Pet Hospital is the country's first-class medical observation programme for pets, in which many people abandon their treatment options because they cannot accept pets.
However, as far as this is concerned, the pet shop has to be held accountable for the damage done to the dog, and now the owner of the dog has called the police and the association has been registered with the pet shop.
In modern society, many people raise pets, raise feelings, and naturally hope that they will not be ill, so pet hospitals and pet shops are also places where pet owners have to deal with each other, with more or less bends, suggesting:
1. The choice of chains to operate pet shops and hospitals, with many hospitals carrying out beauty projects, which are more functional and specialized, makes the choice of chains safer.
2. Microclinics for pet hospital personnel, bookings, regular wound treatment, etc. can save time and even money.
pet shop behavior, what do you think?