The eight-year-old walked in the district and was scared and injured by a golden fur dog without a rope, which was identified as a category 10 disability. In recent days, the People ' s Court of the Saffron Dam in Chongqing City has issued a first instance ruling that Cai should be held liable for the violation of rights in his capacity as a dog keeper of gold, in the amount of over $51,000 in compensation for the medical expenses of the elderly, disability compensation, etc.
It is understood that, after eight years, the court found that Peng Cai had come home on foot with his daughter in a small district of the Yang Bridge, and that he had fallen and fallen as a result of a panic attack on the plaintiff as he travelled to five small playgrounds in front of two residential buildings.
On the same day, at about 2300 hours, Peng was hospitalized at the central hospital of the Saffon Dam in Chongqing City for 12 days. The diagnosis of discharges was: a fracture (psychotic haematoma certificate) by Chinese medicine; and a fracture between femurs by Western medicine, contraction prior to the onset of the inoculation period.
The day after the incident, one of Peng's relatives called the public security authorities and said: “The mother of the person who reported to the police was tripped last night because of a dog fight and is currently in a hospital with the owner of the dog in the sand dam, which is to be dealt with in consultation with the civilian police.” The civilian police immediately arrived at the hospital in the saloon dam to learn about the situation and recommended that the parties mediate or conduct judicial proceedings in relation to the costs of the wounded.
In the case in question, the defendants were Zhu Chia and Cai, both residents of the district, and Zhu Chia raised a border shepherd dog, and Zai Ho, a yellow golden fur dog and a small white dog. On the night of the incident, Zhu Chiu and Zhou Cai, each with their own dog, went to five small entertainment playgrounds in the district and two residential buildings to play with the dog. At this point, neither Zhou nor Zhou Zhou Zi had a leash on his dog.
The Court commissioned the Ninth People ' s Hospital in Chongqing City to conduct a judicial assessment of the degree of disability in Peng Chiang, the subsequent overhaul project, the period of care and the period of nutrition. Previously, the accreditation body issued a certificate stating that the designated person, Peng-i, had a level of disability of 10, that the follow-up project had been carried out with a fixed internal device, that the care period was assessed at 150 days and that the nutritional period was assessed at 150 days.
The court found that the evidence found during the trial showed that Cai had taken the golden fur dog he had raised to a public place and that the dog only ran untaught to the vicinity of Peng, the plaintiff, who had walked through the regular passages from the district, causing Peng Hoi to fall and fall in shock, and that Cai Ho, as a dog breeder, was responsible for the violation. At the same time, the evidence at hand does not prove that Zhu ' s dog raised the border guards and at the same time caused alarm to the plaintiff. When interviewed after the complainant ' s injuries, he also stated that he was frightened by a yellow dog.
As a result, it was difficult for the Tribunal to hold the accused, Cai-Ki, responsible on the basis of his unilateral statement. The plaintiff ' s application for liability from the defendant, Zhu Chiu, was not upheld by the court. In conclusion, the Court rendered the above-mentioned judgement.