In recent weeks, Li Ting, an alias resident in Jiangsusu County, had been pregnant and had never thought of a normal district walk that would cause her to lose her child. In the evening, as usual, she walked in the green belt of the district and suddenly came out of the bush with three untied Teddy dogs, barking around her.

“I was shivering, and I had to stand still and retreat.” Li Ting recalled that three dogs were getting closer, one of them pounced to her calves, with sharp teeth gnawing through jeans and leaving two blood marks. She was in shock, and Mr. Zhou, the owner of the dog, came from afar, slowly scolding the dog. At that point, two other dogs jumped on her thigh and left many bruises, although they did not bite her skin.
When the family learned of the incident, Li Ting was taken to hospital, and the medical examination revealed that she had two second-degree exposure wounds to her calf and had to be vaccinated against rabies. “Doctors have made it clear that, although the vaccine is not clearly teratogenic, there is still a risk of mid-pregnancy use and it is recommended that it be closely observed.” Li Ting ' s husband Wang Yi (alias) said that he and his wife had been vaccinated by accident, hoping that the foetus would be safe.
During the next two weeks, Li Ting's baby was born on time and the baby's heart was normal. On the third day after the second dose, she suddenly suffered from abdominal haemorrhage, and after urgent medical treatment, B showed that the foetus had ceased to develop. “... According to the doctor, the effects of the vaccine on the foetus are not excluded, and the shock and trauma have led to the termination of the fetus.” Wang Qi, in his red eye, said that his wife had been lying in a sick bed after the surgery and had shed tears daily, repeatedly asking, “Why me?”

Then they found the owner of the dog, Mr. Zhou, and the other side argued: “My dog is usually a good boy, you scared them, and the vaccine is not necessarily the reason for the birth stop”. This was a complete provocation to Wang Qi, who called the neighbourhood surveillance and found that Mr. Zhou had been walking his dog without a leash for a long time, after several residents had complained. Currently, both parties have entered legal proceedings for compensation, and sub-district property has strengthened controls over uncivilized petry.
The tragedy has troubled many owners. “The premise of freedom of rearing is not to harm others, especially pregnant women, the elderly and children.” Aunt Zhang, a resident of the district, said that it was to be hoped that all the pets would learn the lessons, tie the strings and assume their responsibilities and not allow similar tragedies to recur.