I didn't think it was just a business trip to put a dog in a pet store for six days.
And during these six days, the dog was severely abused, without water or food, and was attached to a small cage for six days.
The worst thing about it is that the owner's dog died and the shopkeeper not only played leatherball, but also said the most outrageous thing about what happened to the dead dog.
And now, after that, the shopkeeper refused to pay for it on his own initiative, even though the owner had saved money, more serious results were happening.
It is assumed that the owner himself did not realize that, as a pet shop with a chain of four or five, the business could have been so bad.
The blogger is an online red from Sichuan and has nearly 3 million fans on the platform. On 19 August, the owner placed the pet dog Samoyemi in a pet shop in Chengdu for travel.
The pet store was previously in foster care, and was reassured that Mimi was in foster care in his house. I didn't expect this foster care to happen.
At first, the blogger felt something wrong. In the past, regardless of the foster care, the organizers received photographs and videos of pets on a daily basis.
But this time at his house, for six days, no picture or video of a dog ever returned.
But the blogger should be busy, not have time to talk to them, and he is a boy, not too old, and probably not too careful, so just go back and pick up the dog after the total mission.
As a result, on the sixth day, at 4 p.m., the blogger suddenly received a call from the pet store saying that Mimi was dead.
At first, the blogger didn't think it was Mimi who died of natural causes, but he couldn't come back and asked his friends in Chengdu to help see what was going on.
It doesn't make any sense. At first glance, the rage is like a shack.
The monitor found out that his dog was dying of thirst! Mimi was placed in foster care for six days, with only the first three days being fed with water and food, and the remaining period being completely unscheduled.
Even 30 hours before Mimi died, he didn't even drink water.
Think of it as a more than 30-degree weather. Dogs are long hairy, thinner than people. They need more water. But the pet store can be so cruel as not to feed the dog for more than a day.
And even more inhumanly, the blogger found that rice had been tied to this little cage for six days without moving, and that the owner of the store had a name: training dogs to use the toilet.
The blogger was even more angry: I didn't need you to train at all, I made it clear when I was in foster care that it was just foster care, without any skills training.
I mean, even if the shopkeeper really wanted to train, would it take 30 hours for a dog to drink water? It's obvious it's a big deal.
But when the blogger went to the pet shop to question him, he was hit with a leather ball. The owner of the store said that the delivery of the video was a matter for the reception, that the inspection and feeding were for the housekeeper, and that it was for the dog trainer to tie up there.
Then the blogger went to question the dog trainer, and he got yelled at. There's nothing to think about. He's in a hurry to call the police, and he's got a big attitude.
Immediately after the incident, the blogger posted the incident online, causing considerable debate.
Some netizens in Chengdu said they had heard of the name of the pet shop, which had at least four under his banner, but each was largely irresponsible.
The same experience is shared by netizens who say that the last foster care was normal, probably because their dog died there at that time, so the other person took it seriously for a while.
This guy's dog is also a little Internet red, a little famous. The shopkeeper may have been in the process of doing so for some time, but he has since recovered.
The owner of the shop finally showed up and said that he would pay compensation.
But the blogger did not want to use the dog traffic, nor did he pay for it; he wanted a statement and then rejected the other.
But the boss doesn't seem to have much of a heart, and when the blogger refuses, he's afraid of being sidelined.
Such an attitude is really chilling and gives him even more serious consequences.
Since the shopkeeper did not want to make amends, apologized or made mistakes, he had to accept more serious consequences.
Now the pet shop has been picked up by Internet friends, and people have come to one of the platforms on which he's up to give low ratings. I didn't think I'd get more black from the boss.
Consumers said that they had given his family a bad rating because of the poor service of the pet shop, but had not thought that the boss had come after him in a private letter and called him a social cornerer, garbage.
There was also feedback from netizens that the dog food he bought in his house had cigarette butts in it and that it was extremely unsanitary. And the other side's attitude, which is "no big deal" for you, doesn't say it's going to improve.
More than that, a friend's dog always ate his family's dog food, so it's three years old.
Now that the pet shop's comment area has fallen, the business is probably too bad.
But if you open a pet store and make money for the pet owner, should you be nice to the dog? That's the basic ethics, isn't it?
If you can't even get those foundations, and you want money and fame, then don't blame everyone for your bad judgment and lack of support. Unblemished merchants cannot go far. What do you think?