Canadian pet card false propaganda: the business mess behind the $30,000 ticket

Canadian pet card false propaganda: the business mess behind the $30,000 ticket

In recent days, an investigation by the Shanghai Market Supervisory Authority has revealed an alarming fact: “Cremont Ureberry” claims that “the efficacy is equivalent to antibiotics”, based on a summary of a 2016 paper, whereas the original text merely refers to “cranberry extracts that may assist in preventing urinal infections”. More ironically, the company had been punished for similar problems, this time in the form of “a heavier penalty for recidivism”.

“This is a classic `discretionary extraction'.” According to veterinary experts, “the pet health care industry has a low threshold, with some enterprises using consumer aversion to professional terminology.” The incident prompted the Skycat platform to enhance pet food auditing, requiring merchants to provide complete research and third-party testing certificates.

The content of the “statement” shows that “in order to provide a better shopping experience, we have overhauled the treasure-hunting detail page. This overhaul optimized the presentation of detailed pages and improved the accuracy of commodity information. It is our hope that this overhaul will make it easier for customers to obtain information on commodity characteristics, specifications, etc.”

In response to the specific meaning of the “declaration”, journalists consulted the merchant's guest service, which stated that the “declaration” was primarily intended to comply with the requirements of the advertising law and that the limit words and words had been adjusted for the first half of the year.

“Penal penalties are not an end in itself, and we would like to promote the establishment of standards of integrity in the industry.” The head of the Market Regulatory Authority stated that “when `the healing' becomes marketing, it ultimately harms all the foster families”.