Chen prefers turtles, and there are more than a dozen glass tanks in the home for different species of turtles. He said that in July, a tortoise had been sold through a second-hand platform and that the buyer had contacted him for over a month and said that the tortoise had been received by the male.
Chen said it had been five or six years since she had raised her own turtles and that more than a dozen glass cylinders in her family had raised a variety of turtles at prices ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of dollars.
In July, he sold an egg turtle about 1 year old on a “free fish”.
The text of the introduction on the page refers to the "Whipshot confirmed no, the video is " .
The last purchaser, Mr. Cheng, bought the turtle at a price of 4800, which was on 9 July.
Chen: This tortoise buys a tortoise because it's big enough to feed me and I don't like it. I sell it to my friend for a friendly price. My friends don't want to raise them, they want to play with other turtles, we sell them together.
Reporter: What about the mother of this turtle?
Chen: The tortoise's limbs are squeezed and if it's male, the genitals are exposed. When I got to his side, I taped a 20-second video in the form of a squeeze, squeezed so hard that I could see no genitals coming out, and we decided it was a tortoise.
The journalists looked into the scope of application of the Code for the Handling of Disputes over Bidfish Community Petty Lives, which includes cats, dogs, birds, aquatics and pets.
Chen said that he had sold a lot of turtles on “free fish” and the platform allowed such orders to be made. More than a month after the parties had concluded their deal, on 14 August Mr. Cheng contacted Chen through “free fish”, referring to “the tortoise is male”.
Several videos were also sent in which it could be seen that the tortoise would reach a column on its tail after being squeezed into its limbs.
Chen said the buyer showed that the turtle was indeed male, but not the turtle he sold himself, and that the difference could be seen in comparison to the video taken by the buyer and the seller.
Chen: I made sure when I sold it, and you can see first that the tortoise is fat and has meat, and then the abdomen is not tattooed. For a player, if the age of a tortoise is judged, the size of the abdomen is a standard: a tortoise with a year, the abdomen, like a tortoise with less than a year or submerges, can see that there are no visible openings.
Reporter: What about the video clips the buyer gave you?
Chen: As you can see, the abdominal artery is not too small, and the shell is clearly large, and there is no meat left in the leg.
On the same day, there were many exchanges between the two sides on the “free fish”, and Mr. Fong said, “I will not leave, I will stay, I mean just make up for something”.
Chen replied: "The tail doesn't look like selling your turtles, but the video is crowded and you've seen it."
Later, Mr. Cheng said, “You're a fraud, I'll call the police” and said that a lawyer would be called.
Chen: He insisted that I lied to him, and I told him I didn't cheat you, and I sold you to a tortoise, and you must say I lied to you, and I couldn't help it. This thing you like to sue.
Reporter: When did you learn that your personal information had been retrieved from the platform?
Chen: Just because I was still talking to him, he sent me a copy of the platform's message.
The reporter noted that Mr. Cheng had sent Chen a copy of the Information Disclosure Results on “Little Fish”, which referred to information on fish that had been certified by Chen, including membership, real name, registration number, identification number and contact address.
There is also Mr. Cheng's commitment to “use the relevant information only for purposes of seeking redress through legal proceedings, and any consequences arising from the use of the relevant information for other purposes shall be borne by himself”, which is scheduled for 14 August.
Chen: I was scared, because he had a flashshot, and he didn't say anything, and I reported it to the police station in Hao Tong, in the villa, like my ID number and home address, which I thought was sensitive because I was not sure what his real purpose was.
The report reply from the Hangzhou Haung Tong Police Station states that: “Inquiries have led buyers to obtain information on the source after signing a promise and to use it only in legal proceedings by filing a complaint against the seller on a idle fish platform.”
Chen felt that the dispute between the buyer and the buyer could be resolved entirely through the “free fish” platform, through which the buyer obtained his personal information, and he felt frightened.
Chen indicated that after finding out that the platform had disclosed his personal information to the buyer, he had repeatedly responded to the customers of the “free fish” and that the responses of several operators had made him more depressed.
Chen, “Little Fish” platform gave me four accounts, the first of which was that they would only complete information disclosure through public-to-public consultation. When I questioned it, the second client changed his mouth, saying that the man had signed the promise and gave him the information, which I questioned again. The third client, who said that the system had completed the audit, meant that it had nothing to do with the manual service. After I said that I was going to prosecute them, a higher-ranking customer service had arrived for the fourth time, and he had stressed to me that they treated user information as top secret, that it was only public-to-public, and that there was no possibility of leaking, and that I had to file a complaint.
In front of the press, Chen called again for the “free fish” bus.
(b) A fish passenger service operator: Due to the security of personal information, we are unable to provide you with buyer information online. If you need to do so, you can ask the local public security or court to provide a co-check letter to the platform, which will cooperate fully.
Journalists: On what basis does the platform provide seller information to buyers?
(c) Piped fish passenger service operator: The buyer applies for disclosure of information, requires a commitment that the information disclosed by the platform will be used only for legal remedies, and if the buyer obtains your information, there is a leak or harassment, it can report it through “My Security Centre”.
Chen: The procedure must be legal, and if you have filed a case through the public security or initiated a dispute, the court will accept the matter and file the case. I can at least be sure that you want to go to court with me, that you can settle with me in private now, or whatever, and that I am more concerned about his true intentions.
According to the number provided by Chen, the journalist contacted Mr. Cheng on the telephone to hear his views.
Mr. Buyer: He lied to me, I've got plenty of evidence, I've called the police, I've started the prosecution, I'm going through the formal process.
Reporter: Why did you tell him that the turtle was male on August 14th?
Mr. Buyer: First of all, I have enough proof that my turtle is his, and I have enough proof that it is male. As to how long I've been reporting this as a male turtle, I've been consulting with him, and he's not consulting. As to how I know, sign or not, I'll say in court.
Reporter: When you and the platform asked for his personal information, what was the status of this information?
Mr. Buyer: I can't tell you this either. I've been contacted by the police station in the villa. I'll tell the Public Security Bureau.
Chen: If you go through the police station, I'm a fraud case, or a court-to-law form to get my personal information, I fully understand support. This includes the fact that he did not prepare for the proceedings at first, and that he is bound to do so in order to prove himself or what, and that the platform has an answer to me, as this relates to the personal information of citizens.
Chen felt that if Mr. Cheng wanted to sue himself, he should contact the “free fish” platform, either through the courts or the police, to obtain his personal information in accordance with a legitimate and reasonable process, rather than directly making his personal information available to Mr. Cheng.
Journalists also consulted with lawyers on the matter.
Chen Songtao, Director of the Zhejiang Fong Guo Law Office: First, the platform depends on the user agreement at the time, the conditions that need to be met when the buyer and seller provide the real information, and if there is a clear provision in the platform ' s registration agreement that the seller has fulfilled, the platform provides the information to the seller, it is no problem, and if the platform does not have the authority to do so, this is subject to the platform ' s own consideration, and the platform is available or not at the request of the buyer, it can decide for itself that there is no legal obligation to provide or not to provide it.
A letter was sent to journalists in response to “free fish”, stating that “in situations where the parties to the transaction are involved in a dispute and need to intervene through the police, administrative complaints or litigation, there is a need to apply for disclosure of the seller's information and the buyer is required to submit a dispute order to the customer. The Platform's manual passenger service is subject to review after verification of the disputed order, after the buyer has initiated an information disclosure application to the Platform and signed a letter committing that the information will not be used for other purposes.”
The journalist provided feedback to Chen, who indicated that he did not accept the explanation for “free fish” and would inform market regulators.